The Mullah in Iran has made claims that the minute Iran obtains a nuke he is willing to enter his country in a nuclear exchange with ISREAL a giant martydom operation, this latest test only puts them one step closer..
TEHRAN -- An Iranian foreign ministry official says Tehran successfully tested its long-range Shihab-III missile, capable of hitting targets more than 800 miles away.
The announcement came Monday, two days before Mohammed el-Baradei, the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is due to visit Tehran to discuss Iran's nuclear program.
Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asafi said el-Baradei's visit is "important" to efforts to boost cooperation between Iran and the IAEA, rejecting threats the European Union would impose a trade embargo on Tehran in case it failed to sign a supplementary protocol on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
El-Baradei is expected to hold talks during his one-day visit with Iranian nuclear chief Gulam Reza Agha Zadeh. El-Baradei said Saturday Iran should sign the supplementary protocol allowing more thorough inspections of its nuclear program to pave the way for lifting international restrictions on its nuclear technology.
Iran has said repeatedly its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes but the United States has accused Tehran of developing nuclear weapons and has been pressuring Russia to sever its assistance
darius
07-08-2003, 11:09 AM
i've read the stuff about the missile testing of the shahab-3, but where did u get that first part about a/the??? mullah and the nuclear exchange with israel as a giant martyrdom operation?
Capt'nAmerica
07-08-2003, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by darius
i've read the stuff about the missile testing of the shahab-3, but where did u get that first part about a/the??? mullah and the nuclear exchange with israel as a giant martyrdom operation?
I read it in a Time article I will try to find it and post it..
07-08-2003, 11:32 AM
I hope the whole Middle East gets Nuked
KIP
07-08-2003, 12:13 PM
yes, iran must protect it self against the only country who has used nuckes, the united states...
Capt'nAmerica
07-08-2003, 12:44 PM
Originally posted by KIP
yes, iran must protect it self against the only country who has used nuckes, the united states...
Did you know that if the U.S didn't use nukes the invasion of japan could have killed 2million+ people vs 200k.
We didn't start that war we were attacked first!
KIP
07-08-2003, 12:51 PM
captin america...how is nuking mothers, children, grandmothers and grandfathers any diffrent from sept 11 or terrorism? the US was attacked on a military base. It was a sneak attack, but it was attack against the military, and not mothers, brothers, and little children.
Capt'nAmerica
07-08-2003, 01:18 PM
Originally posted by KIP
captin america...how is nuking mothers, children, grandmothers and grandfathers any diffrent from sept 11 or terrorism? the US was attacked on a military base. It was a sneak attack, but it was attack against the military, and not mothers, brothers, and little children.
OK let me say it again....
Before nuking Japan the U.S was planning a MASSIVE invasion. This invasion wasn't going to be executed using smart bombs it called for massive carpet bombing and a huge troop deployment fighting city to city. Now imagine for a sec how many American troops and japaneese civilians would have lost their lives...
I would have nuked em. The japaneese would have never surrendered that war would have went on for decades.
KIP
07-08-2003, 01:57 PM
Originally posted by Capt'nAmerica
I would have nuked em. The japaneese would have never surrendered that war would have went on for decades.
that war would have gone for decades you say, well then, did you know the USA has been at war with the world secretly and openly? this country can not survive with out war. It is true. look how many wars we were so eager to send teenages to after world war 2.
korea.... they never invaded us, they were fighting communism, or in other words, the interest of the rich.
Vietnam, they never invaded us, but they went to go protect the interest of the rich, yet once again.
and iraq..... yes, bush needs oil, so once agian, to protect the intrest of the rich, they lied to the public about fake weapons, and ever COPIED AND PASTED a report from a college student written in the 1980's to give to the public to hype them up for war..... i think it was called hate week in Orwells 1984....
so kids, if you ever get suspended for stealing reports off the internet, just make the case your government did they same to kill thousands of children, but you only did it to pass the class...
Capt'nAmerica
07-08-2003, 02:04 PM
Originally posted by KIP
that war would have gone for decades you say, well then, did you know the USA has been at war with the world secretly and openly? this country can not survive with out war. It is true. look how many wars we were so eager to send teenages to after world war 2.
korea.... they never invaded us, they were fighting communism, or in other words, the interest of the rich.
Vietnam, they never invaded us, but they went to go protect the interest of the rich, yet once again.
and iraq..... yes, bush needs oil, so once agian, to protect the intrest of the rich, they lied to the public about fake weapons, and ever COPIED AND PASTED a report from a college student written in the 1980's to give to the public to hype them up for war..... i think it was called hate week in Orwells 1984....
so kids, if you ever get suspended for stealing reports off the internet, just make the case your government did they same to kill thousands of children, but you only did it to pass the class...
Are you implying the U.S dropped the twin towers in order for us to go to war???
Hey here a little peice of history..
When we left Vietnam the North proceeded to kill 2million innocent woman and children were they part of the vast American scheme to dominate the world.
Dude stop reading conspiracy books this country isn't perfect but compared to other cess pools it's paradise....