PDA

View Full Version : duce staley pick(draft)



AQBILLSMC
08-24-2003, 08:10 PM
with my inside info i knew he wasnt going to hold out.lol,,,
does that pick of duce in the 3rd round 10th pk look soo bad now or do u think
is playing time will be cut down?

TheHipHopBillGates
08-24-2003, 08:13 PM
BUST!

AQBILLSMC
08-24-2003, 08:52 PM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
BUST!
dont think he's good, gonna have a bad year?

Unclebuc
08-25-2003, 08:41 AM
Taking duce in the 10th round would have been a better pick than the 3rd round.

He has missed all of camp and wasn't that good to begin with. He is gonna have a terrible year. No running back has ever had a good year after holding out.

evil nick
08-25-2003, 09:30 AM
Originally posted by Unclebuc1
No running back has ever had a good year after holding out.

is this true? I can't think of any examples off the top of my head but he does have 2 weeks of camp left.

and i agree that duce is probably not a great fantasy player this year. His numbers were pretty good last year but that's deceiving, he racked up some big yards a few games but was very inconsistent. Now that Correll is back he'll lose carries and he might be more of a 3rd down back. He's still a good pass catching rb.

TheHipHopBillGates
08-25-2003, 12:55 PM
then next full round of picks after your duece pick
b. johnson
b.favre
k.robinson
t.heap
t.holt
tampa bay d
i. bruce
a. toomer
d. driver
k. johnson
p. price
b. franks
w. green
r. smith
d.mason
philly def

all who I think will put up more points or with the exception of franks(who will be more valuable in comparison at his position) then staley. If wish you would have taken w.green instead and not let him fall to buc in the 4th round.

evil nick
08-25-2003, 01:03 PM
duce can put up pretty good receiving numbers. If youre not starting TE's only receivers then I'd take him over heap.

TheHipHopBillGates
08-25-2003, 01:16 PM
but would u take him over some of those recievers that went after him?and we are starting TE's. And I think heap may have to put up big numbers this year because of the qb situation and lack of a quality reciever, going to be alot of short and dump off passes.

evil nick
08-25-2003, 01:39 PM
oh if you guys start a TE then it's a better pick..wasn't sure. I think Heap is gonna have a big year, he's a great pass catching TE.

I agree with your list...but unfortunately the rb's in this draft are light (like most years). So you have to reach for a questionable early sometimes to fill the position.

I hope to draft 2 backs right away...Or one back early then a couple stud WRs.

Unclebuc
08-25-2003, 01:41 PM
that staley pick was one of the woprst in the draft....right next to mikey numb nuts drafting shockey in the 1st round

evil nick
08-25-2003, 01:43 PM
i think Mikey might make 9 of the top 10 worst picks.

TheHipHopBillGates
08-25-2003, 01:52 PM
Originally posted by evil nick
oh if you guys start a TE then it's a better pick..wasn't sure. I think Heap is gonna have a big year, he's a great pass catching TE.

I agree with your list...but unfortunately the rb's in this draft are light (like most years). So you have to reach for a questionable early sometimes to fill the position.

I hope to draft 2 backs right away...Or one back early then a couple stud WRs.

like I said he could have had w. green a much better pick or stewart who buck got in like the 10th round or o. smith who I got in the 10th. But guarnteed starters, duce isnt that.

AQBILLSMC
08-26-2003, 12:50 AM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
then next full round of picks after your duece pick
b. johnson
b.favre
k.robinson
t.heap
t.holt
tampa bay d
i. bruce
a. toomer
d. driver
k. johnson
p. price
b. franks
w. green
r. smith
d.mason
philly def

all who I think will put up more points or with the exception of franks(who will be more valuable in comparison at his position) then staley. If wish you would have taken w.green instead and not let him fall to buc in the 4th round.
i was def going w/ a rb, i ended up w/ ravens d so i didnt lose pts there.if u dont get the top 3 receivers
i read u can wait till later rounds ,cuz in the end they'll all be around the same, and i wasnt picking a te in the
3rd round.wille green scored 1 td in his first nine games and averaged 2.3 yds per carry.then after the
bye put up good #'s but only against teams w/ bad defences.week 16 56yds on 20 carries(balt) and in
playoffs 30yds on 25 carries(pitt) both div teams. hard to run on.

08-26-2003, 12:53 AM
I gotta drop a deuce

TheHipHopBillGates
08-26-2003, 12:56 AM
willie green didnt play much in the beginning because jamel white was the starter, over the 2nd half of the season green was one of the top 5 most productive backs, the playoff game he did bad because the team was behind and the qb threw for 429 yards. Green will have good numbers. I agree on waiting on recievers, there were still good recievers not even picked. Bottomline how can you take a guarnteed starting back over one thats not guarnteed?

Steve Psych
08-26-2003, 01:02 AM
Shockey was the worst pick at number 1
Followed by Michael Vick whenever he was taken
then you have Duce Staley at number 3

TheHipHopBillGates
08-26-2003, 01:13 AM
don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to bust your chops or anything, I just think you could have got him alot later. But if he does turn out to have a good year, maybe we ll look like the idiots.

AQBILLSMC
08-26-2003, 01:24 AM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
willie green didnt play much in the beginning because jamel white was the starter, over the 2nd half of the season green was one of the top 5 most productive backs, the playoff game he did bad because the team was behind and the qb threw for 429 yards. Green will have good numbers. I agree on waiting on recievers, there were still good recievers not even picked. Bottomline how can you take a guarnteed starting back over one thats not guarnteed?
u make good pts not like other retards that just say things like "that pk was sttupidddd".
the way i see it, green is playing balt and pitt twice each.he's not going to a lot of touches vs.teams like that ,he's just not strong enuf and only has avg speed.also he suckssss in short yardage situations, so he wont be getting the ball at the goalline.i highly doubted that staley would not be on any team by the start of the season.even though mcnabb does a lot of the running i'm sure his rushes will go down because of the injury scare.also eagles picked up jon ritchie from oak
for blocking

TheHipHopBillGates
08-26-2003, 01:40 AM
what about buckwalter?

AQBILLSMC
08-26-2003, 02:04 AM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to bust your chops or anything, I just think you could have got him alot later. But if he does turn out to have a good year, maybe we ll look like the idiots.
no u aint busting chops ,i love talking sports, its just when ppl dont back up there
replies it makes u wonder if they know abt sports at all.i can take criticism or someones
opinion as long as u know what your talking abt

AQBILLSMC
08-26-2003, 02:10 AM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
what about buckwalter?
its buckhalter ,and he's coming off a serious injury and also isnt a good receiver.
he's faster then staley but this guy was a backup at nebraska.levens is gone ,so it will mostly be
staley or westbrook

Steve Psych
08-26-2003, 03:22 AM
Originally posted by AQBILLSMC
its buckhalter ,and he's coming off a serious injury and also isnt a good receiver.
he's faster then staley but this guy was a backup at nebraska.levens is gone ,so it will mostly be
staley or westbrook

Im hoping on Westbrook

Unclebuc
08-26-2003, 08:41 AM
Westbrook ain't seeing shit....

Its all buckhalter right now....Staley isn't gonna get regular touches until week 3. He is behind.

TheHipHopBillGates
09-02-2003, 10:05 PM
Originally posted by AQBILLSMC
its buckhalter ,and he's coming off a serious injury and also isnt a good receiver.
he's faster then staley but this guy was a backup at nebraska.levens is gone ,so it will mostly be
staley or westbrook

I still don't like staley, but that late round pick on gary maybe the steal of the draft.

AQBILLSMC
09-02-2003, 11:02 PM
ya, he'll prob be starting now w/ det right?-- its good for my fantasy team but i'm a bills fan
dont know y they got rid of him

evil nick
09-03-2003, 08:12 AM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
I still don't like staley, but that late round pick on gary maybe the steal of the draft.

Gary couldn't get it done in Denver with that great system, not so sure he's gonna be a productive back in Detroit. He might be the every down starter but his numbers will probably look like A. Thomas's were last year. Could be wrong...

evil nick
09-03-2003, 08:14 AM
Originally posted by AQBILLSMC
ya, he'll prob be starting now w/ det right?-- its good for my fantasy team but i'm a bills fan
dont know y they got rid of him

they think Magahee will be ready by Oct-Nov.

TheHipHopBillGates
09-09-2003, 12:31 AM
duce looked awesome tonight :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL

AQBILLSMC
09-09-2003, 12:39 AM
Originally posted by TheHipHopBillGates
duce looked awesome tonight :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL
mcnabb looked sooo lazy night.killed my fantasy week.. tamba's D looks better then ever